Disposed

Arkay Energy(Rameswaram) Limited v. Pankaj Kumar Bansal

Madras HC25 Oct 2021CONT P/984/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court closed a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act. Reporting that the interim order was partially complied with, the court directed closing of the petition and posting of the main writ petition. A connected sub-application was also closed.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed; directed to post main writ petition; sub-application closed.

Arkay Energy(Rameswaram) Limited Vs Pankaj Kumar Bansal — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 25.10.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

Contempt Petition No.984 of 2021 and Sub Application(OS) No.292 of 2021

¶6

Arkay Energy (Rameswaram) Limited, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Mr.T.S.Das No.20, Old No.129, Chamiers Road, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. ... Petitioner

¶7

vs.

¶8

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Bansal, Chairman cum Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Company Limited, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. ... Respondent

¶9

PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for the willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 16.12.2020 in W.P.No.18122 of 2020.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.Anirudh Krishnan For Respondent : Mr.J.Ravichandran Additional Advcoate General assisted by Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh.J Standing Counsel

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This petition has been filed to punish the respondent for the willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 16.12.2020 in W.P.No.18122 of 2020.

¶14

2.It is reported that the interim order passed by this Court on 16.12.2020 was complied with and 50% of the total dues was paid to the petitioner. An affidavit has also been filed before this Court. Insofar as the balance amount is concerned, the same will be gone into in the main writ petition and the respondent is directed to file a counter affidavit. A copy of the affidavit filed by the respondent shall also be served on the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶15

3.In view of the above, this contempt petition is closed and the Registry is

¶16

directed to post the main writ petition on 08.11.2021. Consequently, connected sub application petition is closed.

¶17

SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶18

ssr

¶19

//Certified to be true copy//

¶20

Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.

¶21

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

To The Chairman cum Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Company Limited, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶24

Copy To The Section Officer, Writs Sections, High Court, Madras. [For Posting Writ Petition on 08/11/2021]

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Arkay Energy(Rameswaram) Limited v. Pankaj Kumar Bansal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arkay Energy(Rameswaram) Limited v. Pankaj Kumar Bansal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G Vasudevan Vs S.Selvarasu

K.Thangavelu Vs Mr.Sampath

C.Marudha Muthu Vs Dr.Tharesh Hammed IAS

K.Mariyappan Vs Sumathi

Vijayakumar Vs The Principal Secretary

M/s.Kiran Global Chems Ltd., Vs Under Secretary to the Government of India