G.Rajendran v. L.Sitherasenan
Case brief
What is this about?
The single Judge closed a contempt petition alleging disobedience of an order in W.P.No.19058 of 2012. The court held that since the representation was considered and action initiated challenging which was later disposed of in a subsequent writ, nothing remained for consideration, and the connected sub-application was also closed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed; connected Sub-Application closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.980 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.09.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
and
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Cont.P.No.980 of 2013 and
Sub-Application (OS) No.448 of 2019
G.Rajendiran, No.4, Nellukura Street, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram 631 502 ... Petitioner
Vs.
L.Sitherasenan
The District Collector, O/o. The Collectorate at Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any relieves survives when the underlying representation has been considered by the Municipality after a subsequent writ disposed of the related petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G.Rajendiran
- respondent
L.Sitherasenan
- respondent
The District Collector, O/o. The Collectorate at Kanchipuram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Khivraj Automobiles and Infrastrucutre Pvt. Ltd.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S.Khivraj Automobiles and Infrastrucutre Pvt. Ltd.
The Commissioner Vs M/S. Danfos Industris Pvt.
M/S.Cognizant Technology Solutions P Ltd. Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax