Disposed

Samson Sugirdaraj v. Mr.K.Magara Poosanam Iasq

Madras HC19 Jan 2021CONT P/858/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt petition filed for alleged disobedience of a 2013 order in a writ petition regarding regularization of services and payment of arrears, the court accepted the respondent's submission that a subsequent government order had fully complied with the earlier directive. Consequently, the court found nothing surviving to be adjudicated and closed the petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

Samson Sugirdaraj Vs Mr.K.Magara Poosanam Iasq — Madras HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Cont.P.No.858 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 19.01.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR Contempt Petition No.858 of 2016

Samson Sugirdaraj

.. Petitioner

-Vs-

Mr.K.Magara Poosanam I.A.S., The Director of Town Panchayat Kuralagam, Chennai. .. Respondent Prayer : Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act,

¶10

1971 to punish the respondent for disobeying the order of this Hon'ble Court dated

¶11

01.02.2013 in W.P.No.20302 of 2012.

¶12

For Petitioner : Ms.S.Mekhala For Respondent : Mr.M.Elumalai, Additional Government Pleader

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

This Contempt Petition has been filed for the alleged disobedience of the

¶15

orders of this Court dated 01.02.2013 made in W.P.No.20302 of 2012.

¶16

When this Contempt Petition is taken up for hearing today,

¶17

Mr.M.Elumalai, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent, on instructions, has submitted that, in compliance of the orders of this Court referred to above, the Government has issued a Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.429 dated 30.10.2017, Municipal Administration and Water Supply

¶18

Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, regularising the services of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

Page 1 of 2

¶20

Cont.P.No.858 of 2016

¶21

petitioner after he completed 10 years of service as daily wages of course from the

¶22

original date of his first engagement ie., in the year 2004 and from that date, the salary due also payable to the petitioner, as has been directed by this Court in the aforesaid writ petition, had also been calculated and paid on 10.11.2017 to the extent of Rs.7,60,746/- and also the petitioner, having received the salary due, has acknowledged the same. By relying upon these details, the learned Additional Government Pleader would submit that in view of the full compliance of the orders of this Court, the Contempt Petition may be closed.

¶23

Recording the said submission made by the learned Additional

¶24

Government Pleader, as nothing survives and in view of the said compliance, no

¶25

further orders are required to be passed as no further issue is pending to be adjudicated in this Contempt Petition. Therefore, this Contempt Petition is closed.

¶26

SD/-

¶27

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) kst //Certified to be true copy//

¶28

Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.

¶29

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. GS/09/08/2021

¶30

¶31

The Director of Town Panchayat Kuralagam, Chennai.

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

Page 2 of 2

Samson Sugirdaraj v. Mr.K.Magara Poosanam Iasq

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Samson Sugirdaraj v. Mr.K.Magara Poosanam Iasq

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Muthusamy Vs Tamilandu Waterhousing

V. Sundararaju Vs the Tamilnadu Textile

D. Thangappan Kurukkal Vs Union of India

K. Subramani, Vs the Chief Secretary

S. Paul Packkiaraj, Vs Deputy General of Police

A. Yedukondalaiah Vs the Joint Director of School