Munusamy v. S.Abeeth Hussain
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt petition challenged the non-compliance of an order dated 06.08.2009 directing the Tashildar to implement a prior decree. The court found the contemnor directed to pay the amount with interest, closing the petition.
What did the court decide?
Respondent directed to pay the amount plus interest accrued from the date of receipt to actual payment date within six weeks.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.719 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.03.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Cont.P.No.719 of 2010
1.Munusamy
2.V.Munusamy 3.T.Ponnusamy 4.M.S.Michael Das (Rep by their Treasurer K.Munusamy, Task Force Union, No.9, Tulikanam Road, Varadarajapuram, Chennai – 600 002. (now disbanded)) ... Petitioners
Vs
S.Abeeth Hussain, The Tashildar, Mylapore -Triplicane Circle Taluk, Chennai – 600 028.
... Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for committing contempt of Courts by disobeying the order dated 06.08.2009 in W.P.No.15498 of 2001.
For Petitioners : No appearance
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent Tashildar committed contempt of court by disobeying the order dated 06.08.2009 to implement a prior decree within eight weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Munusamy
- petitioner
V. Munusamy
- petitioner
T. Ponnusamy
- petitioner
M. S. Michael Das
- respondent
S. Abeeth Hussain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court