Parameswari v. D.Karthikeyan
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition, counsel represented that a sale deed was executed in compliance with earlier orders, completing on 22.04.2021. Consequently, the court held that no violation survives and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed as no violation survives due to compliance of the earlier order via execution of a sale deed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contp No.529 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
CONTEMPT PETITION No.529 of 2021
Parameswari, Plot No.25, Kambar Nagar Scheme, Ayyavupuram, 10th Street, 56th Street, K.K.Nagar, Chennai – 78 ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.Dr.D.Karthikeyan Managing Director Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 005.
2.L.Thaineesnathan,
The Estate Officer – 8, Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board, Sivalingapuram, K.K.Nagar, Chennai 78
3.Arumugam, Head Surveyor, Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board, Kamarajar Salai Chennai 05
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to punish respondents for willful disobedience of orders in W.P No.3521 of 2019.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Parameswari
- respondent
Dr.D.Karthikeyan
- respondent
L.Thaineesnathan
- respondent
Arumugam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court