S. Rajasekaran v. a. Anbarasu, IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 was withdrawn and closed because the respondents submitted that the order impugned in the antecedent writ petition had been complied with. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order of closure.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; connected sub-application closed; liberty granted to challenge order against petitioner.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 04.01.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
Cont.P.No.451 of 2020 and Sub Application(OS) No.238 of 2020
S.Rajasekaran, Depot Manager, Pondicherry Agro Service Industries Corporation Ltd., Karaikal Branch Office, Karaikal, Residing at, No.12, Keezhatheru, Selloor, Thirunallur via, Karaikkal Taluk-609 607
... Petitioner
Vs
- Thiru.A.Anbarasu, I.A.S., Secretary to Government, Agriculture / Chairman, Pondicherry Agro Service and Industries Corporation Limited, Chief Secretariat, Poducherry – 605 001.
- Thiru.G.Raviprakasam, Managing Director, Pondicherry Agro Service and Industries Corporation Ltd., (PASIC), Agro House, Thattanchavady, Puducherry – 605 009.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings need to continue once the order impugned in the writ petition is complied with by the respondents.
Whether the petitioner can challenge the order closing the contempt petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Rajasekaran
- respondent
A.Anbarasu
- respondent
G.Raviprakasam
- respondent
B.Ramakritinanan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court