The respondent had previously established to one possession of the Contempt Petition No. 445 of 2009 was dismissed as nothing survives in the matter due to the dismissal of the main writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.445 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.03.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
Cont.P.No.445 of 2009
The General Secretary, Tamil Nadu Telecom Contract Workers Union, (Telecom working Telephone Exchange), Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Rajapalayam - 626 117. ... Petitioner
Vs.
D.Varadharajan, The Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Tamil Nadu Circle, No.80, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002. ... Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent for willful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble High Court passed in M.P.No.2 of 2008 in M.P.No.1 of 2008 in W.P.No.24552 of 2008 on 22.12.2008, punish the respondent.
For Petitioner : M/s.S.Meenakshi
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the
main writ petition itself was allowed.
1
Cont.P.No.445 of 2009
adjudication. Accordingly, contempt petition stands closed.
pns
SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) //Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
GS/27/04/2021
To
The Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Tamil Nadu Circle, No.80, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.
2
The General Secretary, Tamil Nadu Telecom Contract Workers Union
D.Varadharajan
M.Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
