Dismissed

A.Ambika v. C.N.Maheswaran

Madras HC10 Feb 2021CONT P/31/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the petitioner sought punishment for the respondents for disobeying an earlier court order. The court noted that the petitioner had endorsed that they were not pressing the matter and granted liberty to challenge a subsequent order elsewhere.

What did the court decide?

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution (not pressed).

A.Ambika Vs C.N.Maheswaran — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Cont.P.No.31 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 10.02.2021

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

Cont.P.No.31 of 2021
A.Ambika ... Petitioner
Vs
1.Dr.C.N.Maheswaran, Managing Director,
The Tamil Nadu Water Supply & Drainage Board,
Chepauk, Chennai – 5.
2.Mr.Sengutuvan,
Chief Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Water Supply & Drainage Board,
Vellore – 632 006. ... Respondents

¶7

PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of contempt of Courts Act, 1971

¶8

to punish the respondents for disobeying the order dated 04.11.2019 made

¶9

in W.P.No.24336 of 2017.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.R.Ganesh Babu, Standing Counsel

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/3

¶12

Cont.P.No.31 of 2021

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This petition has been filed by the petitioner to punish the respondents

¶15

for disobeying the order of this court dated 04.11.2019 made in

¶16

W.P.No.24336 of 2017

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner has represented before this court

¶18

that the petitioner is not pressing the matter. He has also made an endorsement to that effect which reads as follows: “The petitioner is not pressing the contempt and seeks liberty to challenge the order dated 19.03.2020 in the manner known to law.” 3.After recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed. SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) nl //Certified to be true copy//

¶19

Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.

¶20

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. IM/02/03/2021

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/3

¶22

Cont.P.No.31 of 2021

¶23

¶24

1.The Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu Water Supply & Drainage Board, Chepauk, Chennai – 5.

¶25

2.The Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Water Supply & Drainage Board, Vellore – 632 006.

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3/3

A.Ambika v. C.N.Maheswaran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Ambika v. C.N.Maheswaran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Janarthanan Mani, S/o.Mani Vs Union of India rep by its

Fayaz Usman Faheed, Vs Union of India rep by its

Zubetha Begum, Vs Union of India rep by its

M.C.Swamy Vs a.K.Rajaduraivel Pandian

Nagappa, S/o.Munisamy, Vs The District Adi Dravidar

A.Ravi Varma Vs The Tahsildar