Disposed
K.Venkatesan, S/O.a.Koyyamani, v. a.Shanmugasundaram
Madras HCCONT P/2069/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No.2069 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.2069 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.10.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
Contempt Petition No.2069 of 2016
K.Venkatesan, No.2/472, Chruch Road, Dr.Ambedkar Nagar, Manapakkam, Chennai 600 116 Rep by his power agent, M.Ramesh S/o.R.Mahendran, No.12/31, SRD Complex, Manalmedu Street, Chennimalai Road, Erode 1 .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.A.Shanmugasundaram 2.K.Palanisamy 3.M.K.Duraisamy 4.K.Ramasamy .. Respondents
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for their wanton and wilful disobedience of the order passed in M.P.No.1 of 2013 in C.R.P.(PD).No.1994 of 2013 dated 15.12.2015.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Krishnan For Respondents : Mr.T.Balaji (For R1) Mr.M.V.Venkateshan (For R2 to R4)
1/2
Contempt Petition No.2069 of 2016
O R D E R
(The matter is heard through 'video conferencing/hybrid mode')
The present Contempt Petition is filed alleging violation of order of
interim injunction granted by this Court on 17.05.2013 in M.P.No.1 of 2013 in C.R.P.(PD) No.1994 of 2013.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the property was encumbered before filing the suit and before the order of this Court. Hence, they have not violated any of the order of this Court. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and respondents further submitted that the suit itself has been settled between the parties.
3.In view of submission of the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that property was mortgaged even before filing of the suit and submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and respondents that the suit itself has been settled between the parties, this Contempt Petition is closed. No costs.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
gsa
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ GS/21/12/2021
2/2
K.Venkatesan
A.Shanmugasundaram
K.Palanisamy
M.K.Duraisamy
K.Ramasamy
V.M.Velumani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court