Dismissed

P.Ravichandran v. Mr.a.Karthic, Ias.

Madras HC22 Oct 2021CONT P/2015/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act was filed to punish respondents for willful disobedience of a prior judgment. The Court recorded submissions that the impugned judgment had been complied with and closed the petition without adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Petition closed as underlying judgment was recorded as complied with.

P.Ravichandran Vs Mr.a.Karthic, Ias. — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Contempt Petition No.2015 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICIATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 22.10.2021

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶7

Contempt Petition No.2015 of 2016

¶8

P.Ravichandran, Secretary, Nehru Memorial College, Puthanampatti, Trichirapalli 621 007

... Petitioner

versus

1.A.Karthic,

Secretary to Government, Department of Higher Education, (Full Additional Charge),

¶13

State of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai.

¶14

2.K.Sekar,

¶15

Director of Collegiate Education (FAC), O/o the Director of Collegiate Education, 9^th Floor, EVK Sampath Buildings, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

¶16

3.S.Anbalagan,

¶17

Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education (i/c), O/o the Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Tiruchirappalli Region, Jamal Mohamed College Campus, No.7, Race Course Road, TVS Tolgate, Tiruchirappalli – 620 020. ... Respondents

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/3

¶20

Contempt Petition No.2015 of 2016

¶21

Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for willful disobedience to the judgment of this Court dated 11.10.2013 made in W.A. No.2318 of 2011.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.Sathiyamoorthy For Respondents : Mr.V.Manoharan, Government Advocate

¶23

JUDGMENT

¶24

(Judgment of this Court was delivered by T.RAJA,J . )

¶25

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned

¶26

Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that the judgment dated 11.10.2013 passed in W.A. No.2318 of 2011 has been duly complied with.

¶27

Recording the submission made by both sides, this Contempt Petition stands closed.

¶28

SD/-

¶29

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶30

vga

¶31

//Certified to be true copy//

¶32

Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.

¶33

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. GS/28/01/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

2/3

¶35

Contempt Petition No.2015 of 2016

¶36

¶37

1.The Secretary to Government, Department of Higher Education, (Full Additional Charge), State of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai.

¶38

2.The Director of Collegiate Education (FAC), O/o the Director of Collegiate Education,

¶39

9^th Floor, EVK Sampath Buildings, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

¶40

3.The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education (i/c), O/o the Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Tiruchirappalli Region, Jamal Mohamed College Campus, No.7, Race Course Road, TVS Tolgate, Tiruchirappalli – 620 020.

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶42

3/3

P.Ravichandran v. Mr.a.Karthic, Ias.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Ravichandran v. Mr.a.Karthic, Ias.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Management of Severn Glocon India Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S.United Labour Federation

The District Collector Vs T.K.Deivasigamani

D.Balaraman Vs the Government of Tamilnadu