A.Rajaram v. Mohan Pyare, IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, the High Court observed that the petitioner had retired and attained the age of superannuation. Consequently, the court held that the relief sought for temporary promotion no longer survived and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P.NO.1957 OF 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
CONT.P.NO.1957 OF 2013
in MP.No.03/2013 in
Wp.No.17469/2013
A.Rajaram, No:2/11-8, 2nd Floor, Andi Koil Street, Melamadai, Madurai - 20
.. Petitioner/Petitioner
Versus
- 1.Thiru Mohan Pyare, I.A.S., Secretary to Government Department of Labour & Employment Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a contempt petition survives when the petitioner has already retired and the relief sought is no longer available.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Rajaram
- respondent
1. Thiru Mohan Pyare, I.A.S., Secretary to Government Department of Labour & Employment
- respondent
2. Dr. B. Chandramohan, I.A.S., Commissioner of Labour Department
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court