Then Indiya Tharaivazhi v. T Prabhakar Rao IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
The court held the present Contempt Petition obsolete due to the government's later policy decisions on regularizing casual laborers and contract workers.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to the petitioner to raise a new dispute if aggrieved.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P.NO.195 OF 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
CONT.P.NO.195 OF 2009
Then Indiya Tharaivazhi Pokkuvarathu Uzhiyargal Sangam (Regd.No.46/kpm) Rep. by its General Secretary VP Chinthan Memorial Old No.24, New No.11, Jagannathan Street, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. ..Petitioner/ Petitioner
Versus
T.Prabhakar Rao, I.A.S., Secretary to Government Labour and Employment Department (Also an Authority of State Advisory Contract Labour Board) Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
.. Respondent/1st Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for disobeying the order of this Court passed in W.P.no.4771 of 2008 dated 28.08.2008.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Then Indiya Tharaivazhi Pokkuvarathu Uzhiyargal Sangam (Regd.No.46/kpm)
- respondent
T.Prabhakar Rao, I.A.S.
Coram
M. Govindaraj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court