Dismissed

J.Sethuraman v. Sabanayagam

Madras HC26 Apr 2021CONT P/194/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a contempt petition for willful disobedience of an order directing the respondent to conduct a survey and pass a final order regarding property boundaries. The court held that the respondent had complied by passing a final order, thereby closing the matter without further adjudication.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition was closed accordingly with no adjournment or further adjudication required.

J.Sethuraman Vs Sabanayagam — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Cont.P.No.194 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 26..04..2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

Contempt Petition No.194 of 2021

¶7

J.Sethuraman, No.232/A, 5^th Main Road, Sadhasivam Nagar, Madipakkam, Chennai – 600 091 ... Petitioner

¶8

-Versus-

¶9

Mr.Sabanayagam The Tahsildar, Ambattur Taluk, Ambattur, Chennai. ... Respondent

¶10

Petition filed under Section 11 of The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order of this court dated 09.09.2020 made in W.P.No.12272 of 2020.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Suresh For Respondent : Mr.S.N.Parthasarathi, Government Advocate

¶12

ORDER

¶13

[This case has been heard through video conference]

¶14

This court, by order dated 09.09.2020 made in W.P.No.12272 of 2020,

¶15

directed the respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 01.06.2020 for survey and fixing four boundaries of the property of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

Cont.P.No.194 of 2021

¶17

petitioner in S.No.227/1 of Korattur Village, Ambattur Taluk and pass final

¶18

orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Alleging contempt of order of this court, the petitioner has come forward with the present contempt petition.

¶19

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate submitted that pursuant to the order of this court, the respondent has conducted enquiry and passed a final order.

¶20

Considering the fact that the the respondent has already passed an order

¶21

pursuant to the order of this court, no further adjudication is required in this

¶22

matter. This contempt petition is closed accordingly. No costs.

¶23

SD/-

¶24

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶25

kmk

¶26

//Certified to be true copy//

¶27

Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.

¶28

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. GS/06/07/2021

¶29

¶30

The Tahsildar, Ambattur Taluk, Ambattur, Chennai.

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

J.Sethuraman v. Sabanayagam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.Sethuraman v. Sabanayagam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manikandan Vs the Inspector of Police

D.Ashokraj Vs The District Collector

M.Nithya Vs State Rep.

I.Rajendran Vs Kanomozhi

Loganathan Vs R.Saraswati

Krishnamurthy Vs Anu