R.Baskaran v. Ramesh
Case brief
What is this about?
This Contempt Petition challenges the non-implementation of a 2014 order directing reinstatement. The Court found substantial compliance via absorption in 2019 and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedy in accordance with law.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.1850 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.03.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Cont.P.No.1850 of 2017
R.Baskaran Muththa Goundalur, Puththagaran Post, Natrampalli Taluk, Vellore – 635 651. ... Petitioner Vs
Rames,
The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd, Vellore.
... Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.11939 of 2006 dated 28.04.2014.
For Petitioner : M/s.K.Abirame for Mr.V.Raghavachari
For Respondent : Mr.C.S.K.Sathish
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order in the writ petition has been substantially complied with despite a delay of several years.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Baskaran Muththa Goundalur
- respondent
The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd
Coram
C. Saravanan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court