T.Senthil Murugan v. Dhatchanamoorthy
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant moved the High Court for contempt of an earlier order by against Indian Bank. The respondents filed a writ appeal that obtained an interim stay. Recording the submission of counsel, the court closed the contempt petition without adjudicating the merits, effectively disposing of the matter through the stay. The order is a procedural dismissal.
What did the court decide?
The court recorded the submission and ordered the closing of the Contempt Petition without adjudication.
What the court decided
CONT.P.NO.1685 OF 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
CONT.P.NO.1685 OF 2015
T.Senthil Murugan, No.13/2, Krishna Rao, 3rd Street, Dindigul
.. Petitioner
Versus
1.Mr.Dhatchanamoorthy The General Manager (HRM) Indian Bank Corporate Office No.254-260, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai – 600 014.
2.Mr.Shankar
The Chief Manager Indian Bank – Main Branch No.9, Chathiram Street, Dindigul – 624 001.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be allowed despite the filing of a writ appeal with an interim stay.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
T. Senthil Murugan
- respondent
Indian Bank (represented by Dhatchanamoorthy)
- respondent
Shankar (Chief Manager)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court