V.Ravichandran v. K.Karunanidhi
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed a contempt petition against a respondent for willfully disobeying an interim order in a writ petition, noting that the original writ petition had been allowed and the subsequent order setting aside the award rendered the contempt petition untenable. The petition stands closed.
What did the court decide?
This Contempt Petition stands closed, with no reason to entertain the petition against the respondent.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.1401 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.07.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY
Cont.P.No.1401 of 2015
V.Ravichandran, D.No.334, 202/4/2004, Murugan Koil Street, Kappoor Post, Villupuram District
... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.K.Karunanidhi, General Manager, The Management Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Cuddalore Region, No.2, Imperial Road, Cuddalore. ... Respondent/1st Respondent
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent herein for contempt for willfully disobeying the order dated 29.01.2015 passed by this Court in M.P.No.1 of 2015 in W.P.No.30063 of 2014.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a contempt petition should be entertained when the original writ petition decided against the petitioner was subsequently set aside.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Ravichandran
- respondent
Mr.K.Karunanidhi
Coram
M. Duraismamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court