Dismissed

V.Karunakaran v. Panindra Reddy

Madras HC6 Sept 2021CONT P/1363/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a contempt petition filed against the Chairman of Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board for disobeying an order passed in a writ petition. The Court held that the submission made by the Standing Counsel regarding compliance with the order was recorded, leading to the closure of the contempt petition.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Petition closed, liberty to petitioner to reopen if order is not fully complied with.

V.Karunakaran Vs Panindra Reddy — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Cont.P.No.1363 of 2012

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.09.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

¶7

Cont.P.No.1363 of 2012

¶8

V. Karunakaran President, G.K.M.Colony Consumer Protection Council, No.20, New No.53, Sathiyavani Muthu Street, G.K.M.Colony, Chennai – 600 082. ... Petitioner/Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.Mr. Panindra Reddy, Chairman, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamaraj Salai, Chennai – 600 005.

¶11

2.Mr.Kumarasamy Trustee, Sri Muthu Mariamman Temple, Jambulingam Main Road, G.K.M. Colony, Chennai – 600 082. ... Respondents/2^nd and 6^th Respondents

¶12

[2^nd Respondent impleaded as per order of Court dated 27.11.2013 in Sub.Appln.No.707 of 2013 in Cont.P.No.1363 of 2012]

¶13

Petition filed under Section 11 the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for willfuly and wantonly disobeying the order dated 03.01.2011 passed in W.P.No 21628 of 2009.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

1/2

¶16

Cont.P.No.1363 of 2012

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Stalin for M/s.Row and Reddy For R1 : Mr.S.Prabhu Standing Counsel

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

(Order of the Court was made by T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J. )

¶20

(Through video conferencing)

¶21

When the Contempt Petition is taken up for hearing today, it is

¶22

submitted by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent that the

¶23

order and the direction issued by this Court has been complied with.

¶24

2.Recording the said submission, this Contempt Petition is closed,

¶25

giving liberty to the petitioner to re-open the Contempt Petition, if in case, it is

¶26

found that the order and direction has not been fully complied with.

¶27

SD/-

¶28

jeni/mkn

¶29

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) //Certified to be true copy//

¶30

Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.

¶31

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶32

¶33

The Chairman,

¶34

Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamaraj Salai,

¶35

Chennai – 600 005. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

2/2

V.Karunakaran v. Panindra Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Karunakaran v. Panindra Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N. Selvaraj Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Issac Mathai Nooranal Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Samuel Mathai Nooranal Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Shri Chaganlal Lalji Aswin

S.Nagarathinam Vs Kumar Jayanth IAS

M/S.Rakindo Kovai Township Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax