Disposed

Pista Devi v. Pankaj Kumar Bansil ,I.a.S.

Madras HC19 Mar 2021CONT P/1169/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This contempt petition, filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleged willful disobedience of an interim order. The court noted that the order of 26.02.2021 had been complied with and thus closed the petition and connected sub-application without further findings. No punishment was awarded.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition and connected sub-application were closed without adjudication.

Pista Devi Vs Pankaj Kumar Bansil ,I.a.S. — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 19.03.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

Contempt Petition No.1169 of 2020
and
Sub.Appl.No.451 of 2020
1.Pista Devi,
7/3,Ritherdon Road,
3 rd Lane, Vepery,
Chennai 7
2.Leela Devi,
76 EVK Sampath Road,
Vepery, Chennai 7
3.Rekha,
47,Narayana Mudali Street,
Sowcarpet, Chennai 79 .. Petitioners
vs.

¶7

1.Pankajkumar Bansal (I.A.S) The Chairman, TANGEDCO, 10th Floor, NPKRR Maalligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

¶8

2.Jeyachandran, The Executive Engineer, O & M/Vyasarpadi, 110KV.SS; Campus, Opp To.Ramalingar Koil, Vyasarpadi,

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Chennai 600 039.

¶10

¶11

3.En.A.Pushpanathan, M.Tech.,

¶12

The Superintending Engineer, General Construction (1) TANGEDCO, Thiruvika Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. .. Respondents

¶13

PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971, to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the interim order dt.11.03.2020, passed by this Hon'ble Court in WMP No.7533 of 2020 in W.P.No.6380 of 2020.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Abdul Mubeen, For Respondents : Mr.Vijay Mehanath Standing Counsel ORDER This contempt petition has been filed for the alleged violation of the orders passed by this Court in WMP No.7533 of 2020 in W.P.No.6380 of 2020, dt.11.03.2020.

¶15

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that the order passed by this Court on 26.02.2021, has been complied with. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Wall has been demolished and the petitioner will construct a Wall as undertaken before this

¶16

Court during the previous hearing.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

¶19

This contempt petition is accordingly closed. Consequently, the

¶20

connected sub application is also closed.

¶21

SD/-

¶22

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶23

kp
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25 th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the
Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
GS/25/06/2021
To
1. The Chairman, TANGEDCO,
10th Floor, NPKRR Maalligai,
144, Anna Salai,
Chennai 600 002.
2. The Executive Engineer,
O & M/Vyasarpadi,
110KV.SS; Campus,
Opp To.Ramalingar Koil,
Vyasarpadi,
Chennai 600 039.
3.The Superintending Engineer,
General Construction (1) TANGEDCO,
Thiruvika Industrial Estate,
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

Pista Devi v. Pankaj Kumar Bansil ,I.a.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pista Devi v. Pankaj Kumar Bansil ,I.a.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lenin Vs State by

John a Nirakkal Vs R.Palanisamy

J.Hariharan Vs the Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate Cum Sub Collector

Rekha v Jain Vs Pankajkumar Bansal I.A.S.

C.Suguna Vs Manali Benefit Fund Ltd.

T.Pravin Kumar Vs D.Jagannathan,Ias