Dismissed

A.Selvaraj v. Phanind reddy, Ias.

Madras HC20 Sept 2021CONT P/1115/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Madras closed the contempt petition alleging non-compliance of its judgment dated 17.03.2021. The Court accepted the submission that compliance was effected via orders of the Joint Commissioner dated 09.09.2021 and allowed the petitioner to challenge that order if aggrieved.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed; respondent to forward the order of compliance to the petitioner within three days.

A.Selvaraj Vs Phanind reddy, Ias. — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Cont.P. No. 1115 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20.09.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN

¶5

CONTEMPT PETITION No. 1115 of 2021

¶6

A. Selvaraj, Tahsildar(SSS), Sendamangalam Taluk, Namakkal district ..Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Mr. Phanind Reddy, IAS, The Revenue Administrative Commissioner, O/o the Revenue Administrative Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. ..Respondent

¶9

Prayer: Petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971,

¶10

to punish the respondent herein for wilfully disobeying the order dated

¶11

17.03.2021 passed in W.P. No. 6958 of 2021.

¶12

For Petitioner :: Mr. G. Munuraj For Respondent :: Mr.P. Balathandayutham Govt. Advocate O R D E R

¶13

Alleging non-compliance of the order dated 17.03.2021 passed in W.P. No. 6958 of 2021, the present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner.

¶14

When the matter is taken up today, Mr.P.Balathandayutham,

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1\2

¶17

Cont.P. No. 1115 of 2021

¶18

learned Government Advocate submitted that the order of this Court has

¶19

been complied with by virtue of proceedings of the Joint Commissioner,

¶20

Revenue Administration, Chepauk dated 09.09.2021 and a copy of the said proceedings has also been produced before this Court.

¶21

Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate, the contempt petition is closed. In case, the petitoner is still aggrieved, it is open to him to challenge the said order in the manner known to law.

¶22

The respondent is expected to forward a copy of the order dated

¶23

09.09.2021 to the petitioner either through speed post or RPAD within a

¶24

period of 3 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶25

SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶26

¶27

//Certified to be true copy//

¶28

Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.

¶29

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. GS/21/10/2021

¶30

¶31

The Revenue Administrative Commissioner,

¶32

O/o the Revenue Administrative

¶33

Commissioner,

¶34

Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

2\2

A.Selvaraj v. Phanind reddy, Ias.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Selvaraj v. Phanind reddy, Ias.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T. Loganathan, Vs the Presiding Officer

Subramaniyan, Vs the Management

The Management of Abt Parcel Vs the Presiding Officer

M. Yamunarani Vs Kumaravel

V.Kuppusamy Vs K.Atulya Misra I.A.S.

S.Gowri Vs Thiru. R.Seethalakshmi I.A.S.