C.Malairaj v. Atulya Misra, IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
Three-contempt-petitions-were-dismissed-after-counsel-for-both-sides-stated-that-the-underlying-orders-were-complied-with-and-petitioners-did-not-pursue-matters-further.
What did the court decide?
Inter-several-contempt-petitions, recorded that the orders were complied with and closed the cases without costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.Nos.1083, 1086 & 1078 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.10.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH CONT.P.Nos.1083, 1086 & 1078 of 2017
Cont.P.No.1083 of 2017:
- C.Malairaj
- C.Krishnaveni
- A.Muthu ... Petitioners
vs.
1.Atulya Misra, I.A.S., Secretary to Government, Forest and Environment Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.Dr.N.Krishnakumar, I.P.S., Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Building,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C. Malairaj and Others
- respondent
Atulya Misra and Another
- petitioner
N. Murugesan and Another
- petitioner
S. Kumarasami and Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court