This court closed a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Accepting the respondent's submission that the interim order had been complied with, the court held that the petition required no further action.
No relief granted; the contempt petition is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.1030 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.03.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
Contempt Petition No.1030 of 2009
1. Poovathal
2. Muthulakshmi,
Both are residing at
3, 214/245, Gandhi Nagar,
Quarry Office,
Palakad Main Road,
Madhukkarai,
Coimbatore.
... Petitioners
Vs.
G.Paulraj,
Managing Director,
Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation
(Coimbatore Division-II) Ltd.,
Erode. ... Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts
Act, 1971, to punish the respondent herein for wilful disobedience of the order
passed by this Court in W.P.No.49020 of 2006, dated 16.12.2008.
Contempt Petition No.1030 of 2009
For Petitioners : Mr.V.Ajoy Khose
For Respondent : Mr.A.Sundharavadanan - - - - -
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the
direction issued by this Court has been complied with. In support of his submission, he has produced a letter issued by the respondent in reference No.492/L13/MCOP/TSTC/ERD/21, dated 23.02.2021.
Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
GS/22/03/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Poovathal
Muthulakshmi
G. Paulraj
M. Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
