Disposed

C.Balakrishnamurthy v. C.Jothivenkateswaran

Madras HC9 Jul 2021CONT P/1017/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition filed for disobedience of an interim order in a writ petition was closed pending a separate Petition No. 31770 of 2019 filed by the 3rd respondent to vacate the interim stay. Counsel for the petitioner acceded to allowing the vacate proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Petition closed; party permitted to proceed with pending petition No. 31770 of 2019 for vacating the interim stay.

C.Balakrishnamurthy Vs C.Jothivenkateswaran — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Cont.P.No.1017 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 09.07.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

Cont.P.No.1017 of 2020

¶7

Dr.C.Balakrishnamurthy, No.70-A, Ramachandra Road, R.S.Puram,

¶8

Coimbatore Post & District 641 002

¶9

.. Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.Dr.C.Jothivenkateswaran,

¶12

Director of Collegiate Education, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

¶13

2.Dr.P.Ponmuthuramalingam,

¶14

Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Race Course Road, Next to Income Tax Office, Race Course, Coimbatore – 641 018.

¶15

3.Dr.T.Kannanian,

¶16

Secretary, P.S.G. College of Arts & Science, Civil Aerodrome Post, Coimbatore – 641 014. .. Respondents

¶17

PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for committing contempt of Court by their deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 17.10.2019 made in W.M.P.No.29538/2019 in W.P.No.29640 of 2019.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Raja For Respondents : For R1 & R2 : Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizel For R3 : Mr.R.Bharanidharan

¶20

1/3

¶21

Cont.P.No.1017 of 2020

¶22

ORDER

¶23

(The Case has been heard through Video Conference)

¶24

This Contempt Petition arises out of the interim order passed by this

¶25

Court, dated 17.10.2019 made in W.M.P.No.29538/2019 in W.P.No.29640 of 2019.

¶26

2.It is represented by the learned Government Advocate for the respondents that already, the 3rd respondent herein, has filed a petition in W.M.P.No.31770 of 2019, seeking to vacate the interim order and it is pending.

¶27

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has fairly acceded to and submit that the petitioner may be permitted to proceed with the vacate stay petition.

¶28

4.Recording the same, this Contempt Petition along with Sub Application is closed. Post the vacate stay petition before the regular Court for final disposal.

¶29

SD/-

¶30

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶31

gbi

¶32

//Certified to be true copy//

¶33

Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.

¶34

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶35

2/3

¶36

Cont.P.No.1017 of 2020

¶37

GS/26/07/2021

¶38

¶39

1.The Director of Collegiate Education, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

¶40

2.The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Race Course Road, Next to Income Tax Office, Race Course, Coimbatore – 641 018.

¶41

Copy to:

¶42

The Section Officer, Writ Section, High Court of Madras

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶44

3/3

C.Balakrishnamurthy v. C.Jothivenkateswaran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Balakrishnamurthy v. C.Jothivenkateswaran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Rathnavel, Aged 32 Years, Vs the State of Tamilnadu

R.Murugesan, Aged 49 Years, Vs State Rep. by

C.M.Sabarinath, M/A.23 Years Vs the State Rep by

K.Radha Vs Commissioner of Police Egmore Ch

Rubhan Anthony Ratihnaraj Vs the State Represented by

K.Jayakumar Vs Natarajan