Jeganathan, v. J.Hemalatha
Case brief
What is this about?
In a civil miscellaneous second appeal seeking divorce, the Madras High Court, observing that a compromise was reached and agreed upon by both parties present on record, recorded the compromise memo and closed the appeal without costs to go to either side.
What did the court decide?
Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal closed; terms of compromise memo form part of the order; No costs awarded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMSA(MD)No.25 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated: 16.12.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI
CMSA(MD)No.25 of 2014 N.Jeganathan ... Appellant/Appellant/Petitioner Vs. J.Hemalatha ... Respondent/Respondent/Respondent
Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act and Section 100 Cr.P.C., to set aside the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Appellate Court dated 24.02.2014 passed in C.M.A.No.14 of 2013 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tiruchirapalli confirming the Judgment and Decree of the Trial Court dated 23.07.2013 in HMOP.No.184 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli and allow the Second Appeal.
For Appellant : Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr.N.Vallinayagam
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that compromise has been arrived between the parties and both of them agreed for the divorce.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the compromise agreement reached between the parties satisfies the requirements of the interim filing that the matter be closed?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
N. Jeganathan
- respondent
J. Hemalatha
Coram
Ananthi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court