T.Sakunthala v. a.Govindasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite multiple listed hearings.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal C.M.S.A.No.4 of 2009 is dismissed on account of non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
C.M.S.A.NO.4 OF 2009
T.Sakunthala ..Appellant
Vs. A.Govindasamy ..Respondent
Prayer :
Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 r/w Section 100 of C.P.C, against the fair and Final order dated 21.11.2008 in C.M.A.No.17 of 2007 on the file of the Additional District Court-Fast Track Court No.1, Salem reversing the fair and final order dated 16.12.2006 made in H.M.O.P.No.48 of 2005 on the file of the Sub-Court, Mettur.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.Dhanasekaran J U D G M E N T
W hen the matter was listed for hearing on 21.01.2021, none appeared on behalf of the appellant. Thus, this Court passed an order, directing the Registry to list the matter on 25.01.2021 under the caption “For Dismissal”.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
T. Sakunthala
- respondent
A. Govindasamy
Coram
S.M. Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court