Allowed

The Chief Engineer/Personnel v. M.Rajadurai

Madras HC8 Jun 2021CMP(MD)/3793/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court exercised criminal appellate jurisdiction to extend an interim stay granted during a Writ Appeal filed by TANGEDCO regarding appointment at Anna University. The court made the interim order absolute pending the appeal's disposal.

What did the court decide?

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition for interim stay is allowed and the interim order is made absolute till the disposal of the appeal.

The Chief Engineer/Personnel Vs M.Rajadurai — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CMP(MD) No.3793 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Eighth day of June Two Thousand and Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Honble Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM and The Honble Mrs.Justice S.ANANTHI

¶6

CMP(MD) No.3793 of 2020 IN WA(MD) No.559 of 2020

¶7

THE CHIEF ENGINEER/PERSONNEL THE TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED(TANGEDCO), 144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-600 002. ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT

1 M.RAJADURAI

2 THE REGISTRAR

ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶12

PRAYER IN CMP(MD) No.3793 of 2020:

¶13

Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to grant an interim stay of the order dated 12.11.2019 in WP(MD) No.19487 of 2019, pending disposal of this Writ Appeal.

¶14

PRAYER IN WA(MD)No.559 of 2020:

¶15

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, pleased to allow the Writ Appeal and set aside the order dated 12.11.2019 in WP (MD)No.19487 of 2019.

¶16

PRAYER IN WP(MD)No.19487 of 2019:

¶17

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus , calling for the records relating to the notification in letter 024396/108/G.57G.G.571/2015-19-3, dated 26.08.2019 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to appoint the petitioner for the post of Technical Assistant/Electrical in the first respondent Department.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

CMP(MD) No.3793 of 2020

¶21

ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.P.MALINI, Advocate for M/S.T.S.GOPALAN AND CO., for the petitioner and of MR.S.SIVA TILAKAR, Advocate for 1^st Respondent and MR.R.MURALI, Advocate for 2^nd Respondent, the Court made the following order:-

¶22

[Order of the Court was made by T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J. ]

¶23

At the time of admitting the Writ Appeal, an order of interim stay was granted for a limited period, which has been extended from time to time. Therefore, interim order shall continue till the disposal of the appeal and the same is made absolute. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

¶24

sd/08/06/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶25

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶26

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.3793 of 2020 IN WA(MD) No.559 of 2020 Date :08/06/2021

¶27

msa/cp

¶28

JM/VR/SAR III/15.06.2021/2P/1C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2/2

The Chief Engineer/Personnel v. M.Rajadurai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Chief Engineer/Personnel v. M.Rajadurai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Swathikas Jewellers Vs the Secretary

Kesavamani. K Vs The State rep by

Suresh Kumar.G Vs the District Collector

The Director Vs a. Sakthivelu

Narkis Parvin Vs The Regional Passport Officer

The Director, Vs a.Kamalam