Allowed

S.Radhakrishnan, v. Maria Rex

Madras HC15 Nov 2021CMP(MD)/11439/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court considered a petition for permission to admit documents described in the schedule (a Revision Petition and Postal Receipt) as additional evidence in an associated appeal. The court reviewed the petition, affidavit, and hearing submissions before granting the request.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to receive the listed documents as additional evidence in the pending appeal.

S.Radhakrishnan, Vs Maria Rex — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CMP(MD) No.11439 of 2016

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Fifteenth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶6

CMP(MD) No.11439 of 2016 IN

¶7

SA(MD) No.24 of 2016

¶8

S.RADHAKRISHNAN

¶9

... PETITIONER/ APPELLANT

¶10

¶11

1 MARIA REX

¶12

2 PILLAIYANKATTALAI TIRUNELVELI

¶13

THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER,

¶14

SUDALAIMADAN KOVIL STREET,

¶15

TIRUNELVELI TOWN.

¶16

... RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to grant permission for receiving the documents described in the schedule of the accompanying petition as Additional evidence.

¶18

SCHEDULE

¶19

*S.NO*	*DATE*	DE	*SCRIPTION*
1	17.11.2016 Xerox	Copy of the	Revision Petition filed
	before	the District	Revenue Office Summons
2	19.11.2016 Postal	Receipt

¶20

Prayer in SA(MD) No.24 of 2016:

¶21

To allow the appeal by setting aside the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.160 of 2014 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Tirunelveli, dated 02.07.2015 reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.122 of 2010 on the file of the 1^st Additional District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli, dated 22.08.2014.

¶22

ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.R.T.ARIVUKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.P.SENTHUR PANDIAN, Advocate for the 1^st Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶23

This petition has been filed to grant permission for receiving the documents described in the scheduled of the accompanying petition as additional evidence.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

1/2

¶26

CMP(MD) No.11439 of 2016

¶27

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶28

Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed.

sd/-

15/11/2021

/ TRUE COPY /

/ /2021

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶34

¶35

1 THE ADDITIONAL SUBORDINATE JUDGE, TIRUNELVELI.

¶36

2 THE 1^ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, TIRUNELVELI.

¶37

ORDER

¶38

IN CMP(MD) No.11439 of 2016 IN SA(MD) No.24 of 2016 Date :15/11/2021

¶39

aav

¶40

MS/VR/SAR-2/22.11.2021/2P.3C

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶42

2/2

S.Radhakrishnan, v. Maria Rex

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Radhakrishnan, v. Maria Rex

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thiruvengadam Vs Panchanathan

Deepa Vs Chinnaveliappan

T.Saradambal Vs M/S.United India Insurance

Mrs.Latha and 2 others Vs M.Saiprasad and 4 others

Dhanuskodi, Vs K.Malairaj

S.Radhakrishnan, Vs Maria Rex