CMP(MD) Petition filed by Maria Rex to admit the Revenue Court order in A.P. No. 9 of 2012 as additional evidence in SA(MD) No. 24 of 2016. The High Court Bench allowed the petition based on reasons stated in the affidavit.
Allowed the petition to receive the order passed by the Revenue Court in A.P. No. 9 of 2012 dated 03.03.2016 as additional evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP(MD) No.10734 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Fifteenth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
CMP(MD) No.10734 of 2016 IN
SA(MD) No.24 of 2016
MARIA REX ... PETITIONER/ 1st RESPONDENT
Vs
1 S.RADHAKRISHNAN
... 1st RESPONDENT/ APPELLANT
2 PILLAIYAN KATTALAI TIRUNELVELI, THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SUDALAIMADAN KOIL STREET, TIRUNELVELI TOWN. ...2nd RESPONDENT/ 2nd RESPONDENT
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to receive the order passed by the Revenue Court in A.P.No.9 of 2012 dated 03.03.2016 as additional evidence.
DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENTS
| S.No | Date | Description | Remarks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 03.03.2016 | Order the |
in Tenancy appeal appellant before |
filed by Revenue Xerox Copy |
| Court of 20 |
, Tirunelveli in 12 |
A.P.No.9 |
Prayer in SA(MD) No.24 of 2016:
To allow the appeal by setting aside the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.160 of 2014 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Tirunelveli, dated 02.07.2015 reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.122 of 2010 on the file of the 1st Additional District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli, dated 22.08.2014.
ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.P.SENTHUR PANDIAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.R.T.ARIVUKUMAR, Advocate for the 1st Respondent, the court made the following order:-
This petition has been filed to receive the order passed by the Revenue Court in A.P.No.9 of 2012 dated 03.03.2016 as as additional https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ evidence.
1/2
CMP(MD) No.10734 of 2016
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.
sd/-
15/11/2021 / TRUE COPY /
/ /2021
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
ORDER
IN CMP(MD) No.10734 of 2016 IN SA(MD) No.24 of 2016 Date :15/11/2021
aav
MS/VR/SAR-2/22.11.2021/2P.3C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Revenue Court order in A.P. No. 9 of 2012 should be admitted as additional evidence in the pending appeal.
Maria Rex
S. Radhakrishnan
Pillaiyan Kattalai Tirunelveli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
