S.Ravi v. Dev Anand Vijayan
Case brief
What is this about?
in Cont.A.No.SR145403 of 2019 P.N.PRAKASH…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.8996 of 2021 in Cont.A.No.SR145403 of 2019
P.N.PRAKASH, J. AND
R.PONGIAPPAN, J.
(Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH,J. )
Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 172 days in representing the above contempt appeal is condoned. The Registry shall number the contempt appeal, if the same is otherwise in order. (P.N.P.,J.) (R.P.A.,J.) 01.07.2021 nsd
Coram
P.N. Prakash
R. Pongiappan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court