D.Vatchala v. Krishnaveni
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2017
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.M.P.No.706 of 2017 in A.S.SR.No.46569 of 2016
P.T.ASHA.J.,
The respondents 12, 14, 17 and
18 have remained ex-parte before the
Trial Court. This application has been
filed to condone the delay of 47 days in
filing the appeal in O.S.No.166 of 2009.
Sufficient reasons have been given in
the affidavit filed in support of the
application and accordingly, this
application is allowed and the delay of
47 days is condoned.
2.Notice to the respondents 12,
14, 17 and 18 is dispensed with, only
with regard to the condone the delay
petition.
06.09.2021
gd/vkr
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court