The Special Officer v. K. Karupannan
Case brief
What is this about?
in W.A.No. SR 2637 of 2020 THE HON'BLE CHIEF…
What did the court decide?
Condonation of delay in filing appeal allowed; matter listed for fortnight.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.5935 of 2020 in W.A.No. SR 2637 of 2020
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
Mr.Ma.Pa.Thangavel, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent and he has no objection for condoning the delay.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition seeking to condone the delay in filing the appeal stands allowed.
Let appropriate number be allotted to the matter. The appeal will appear a fortnight hence showing the name of Mr.Ma.Pa.Thangavel, as counsel for the first respondent in the cause list.
bbr
Coram
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court