The Court allowed the employee to file a petition to include the legal representatives of the sole appellant in S.A.No.981 of 2015 and rank them as appellants 2 to 5, dismissing the respondent's objection.
The legal representatives of the sole appellant were impleaded as appellants 2 to 5 in S.A.No.981 of 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.4798 of 2018
S.A.No.981 of 2015
in
C.M.P.No.4798 of 2018 in S.A.No.981 of 2015 M.GOVINDARAJ, J.
This petition has been filed to bring on record the legal representatives of the sole appellant as appellants 2 to 5 in S.A.No.981 of 2015 and rank them as appellants 2 to 5.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the
respondent has no serious objection.
3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in
the affidavit filed in support of the petition and in
view of no objection given by the learned
counsel appearing for the respondent, this civil
miscellaneous petition is ordered.
17.09.2021
ari
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the legal representatives of the sole appellant should be impleaded as subsequent appellants.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Legal Representatives of the Sole Appellant
Respondent
M.GOVINDARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
