Murugan v. Amudha
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of a miscellaneous petition seeking condonation of a 39-day delay in filing an appeal. The third respondent filed no objection. The application was allowed and the appeal was ordered to be numbered.
What did the court decide?
C.M.P. No. 238 of 2018 ordered as prayed for allowing the 39-day delay; Registry directed to number the appeal.
What the court decided
1
C.M.P.No.238 of 2018 in A.S.SR.No.39509 of 2017
P.T.ASHA.J.,
The above application has been filed to condone the delay of 39 days in filing the above appeal.
2.The third respondent has
entered appearance through learned
counsel and has stated that he has no
objection to the petition being ordered.
Accordingly, this Miscellaneous
Petition is ordered as prayed for.
3.Registry is directed to number
the appeal or if it is otherwise in order.
09.09.2021
gd/vkr
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 39 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.T. Asha J.
- respondent
Third Respondent
Coram
gd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court