The Commissioner v. E.Gopal
Case brief
What is this about?
None
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.21096 of 2021
in
W.A.SR.No.74716 of 2019
M. DURAISWAMY, J. and
J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
[Order of the Court was made by M. DURAISWAMY, J. ]
There is a delay of 314 days in representing the papers.
The petitioner has satisfactorily explained the reasons for the delay, in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. In view of the same, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered.
(M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P., J.) 22.12.2021
mkn
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PETITIONER
Coram
M. DURAISWAMY
J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court