M.K.Udayakuar, v. R.Parvathi
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2021 in S.A.No.58 of 2016 M. GOVINDARAJ…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.18670 and 18676 of 2021 in S.A.No.58 of 2016
M. GOVINDARAJ, J.
The vakalat filed by the counsel was not put up in the bundle. It is also submitted that Mr.T.Murugamanickam was designated as a Senior counsel and thats why he could not appear. Therefore the matter was heard ex-parte.
The mistake on the part of the counsel should not adversely affect the litigant that is why considering the hardship caused to the parties, delay is condoned and the matter is posted for hearing on 14.12.2021.
Call for the records.
06.12.2021
kpr
Coram
M. GOVINDARAJ
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court