Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

The Managing Director Vs Gunasekaran (Died) — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

Home
Madras HC
2021
The Managing Director Vs Gunasekaran (Died)The Managing Director v. Gunasekaran (Died)

Allowed

The Managing Director v. Gunasekaran (Died)

Madras HC26 Oct 2021CMP/17254/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the petition to condone a 169-day delay in filing an appeal, satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay of 169 days in filing the appeal.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Condonation of delay of 169 days in filing the appeal.

Issue for consideration

Whether to condone the delay of 169 days in filing the appeal.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

This Court allowed the petition seeking condonation of delay of 169 days in filing the appeal. The Court relied on the affidavit and reasons stated therein and directed the Registry to number the main appeals and post them for admission.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

C.M.P.No.17254 of 2021 in C.M.A.SR.No.91380 of 2021

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

(The case has been heard through video conference)

This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 169 days in filing the appeal.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr.R.Navaneetha Krishnan, learned counsel undertakes to file vakalat on behalf of the respondents/claimants and he has no objection in allowing the petition.

Having regard to the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and this Court being satisfied with the same, the petition is allowed as prayed for.

Registry is directed to number the main appeals, if it is otherwise in order and post the same “for admission” and print the name of Mr.R.Navaneetha Krishnan as counsel for the respondents.

26.10.2021

kk

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether to condone the delay of 169 days in filing the appeal.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
Petitioner
respondent
Respondents/Claimants

Coram

AI extract

Abdul Quddose

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 26 Oct 2021 · October
Registered: 11 Oct 2021
Case no.: CMP/17254/2021
CNR: HCMA011274532021
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: Abdul Quddhose
Disposal: ALLOWED

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Abdul Quddhose

P.Palanisamy Vs K.K.Palanisamy
25 Oct 2021
P.Prabhu Vs S.Muralichandar @ Murali
25 Oct 2021
M/S. Bajaj Allianz General Vs P.Kothandan
25 Oct 2021
Kodai Vs the Arbitrator / District
26 Oct 2021
V.Suriya Vs Sri Ambal Agencies
26 Oct 2021
Mr. Joseph Paul, Vs Mrs. Anjalatchi
26 Oct 2021

Cite this judgement

The Managing Director v. Gunasekaran (Died), CMP/17254/2021 (MAD), decided on 26 October 2021.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Abdul Quddose

Parties & counsel