G. Shantha v. G. Nagalingam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge allowed two miscellaneous petitions to permit amendment of a plaint and receipt of additional documents in an affirmation/impugned order without objection from the respondent.
What did the court decide?
Civil Miscellaneous Petitions 16441 and 16442 of 2018 allowed to permit amendment of plaint and admission of additional documents.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Seventeenth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
CMP.NOs.16441 AND 16442 OF 2018
IN SA.NO.344 OF 2015
G.SHANTHA [PETITIONER IN BOTH THE PETITIONS]
Vs
1 G.NAGALINGAM [RESPONDENTS IN BOTH THE PETITIONS]
2 SHANTHA KUMARI
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to permit the petitioner to amend the plaint in O.S. No.85 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Katpadi with respect to the description of the western boundary of the suit property as detailed below, (CMP.NO.16441/2018) pending disposal of the above SA.NO.344/2015 and;
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to permit amendment of plaint regarding property boundary and admission of additional documents in interim orders.
Whether objectionless miscellaneous petitions for amendment and additional documents should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G.SHANTHA
- respondent
1 G.NAGALINGAM
- respondent
2 SHANTHA KUMARI
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court