R.Rajendiran v. D.Kamala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a petition seeking condonation of a 2129-day delay in filing an appeal against an Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award. The Court held the reasons provided were unsatisfactory and bald.
What did the court decide?
Condonation of delay rejected; the underlying appeal CMA SR84728 of 2021 is also rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.10.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
CMP No. 16269 of 2021 in CMA Sr. 84728 of 2021
1.R. Rajendiran
2.R. Pushpalatha
3.Minor. R. Elakkiya
D/o.R.Rajendran, Minor 3 rd Appellant is Rep by 1 st Appellant
Next friend guardian Father
...Petitioners
Vs.
1.D. Kamala
2.Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Limited, No.6A, Peoples Park,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 2129 days in filing the civil miscellaneous appeal can be condoned given the reasons provided.
Whether the reasons advanced for the inordinate delay are sufficient to warrant condonation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Rajendiran
- petitioner
R. Pushpalatha
- petitioner
Minor. R. Elakkiya
- petitioner
D/o.R.Rajendran
- respondent
D. Kamala
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court