Palanisamy v. Balasubramaniam
Case brief
What is this about?
and 16108 of 2021 in C.R.P.(PD)Nos.3064 and…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.16104 and 16108 of 2021 in C.R.P.(PD)Nos.3064 and 3065 of 2017
C.M.P.Nos.16104 and 16108 of 2021 in C.R.P.(PD)Nos.3064 and 3065 of 2017
V.M.VELUMANI,J.
These petitions are filed to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased sole petitioner viz., Palanisamy as petitioners 2 and 3 in the above C.R.Ps.
2.Mr.V.Ragunathan, the learned
counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the respondent has no objection for allowing these petitions.
3.In view of the no objection given by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, these C.M.Ps. are ordered. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title and list the C.R.Ps. on 25.10.2021.
05.10.2021
[½]
kj
Coram
V.Velumani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court