S.Shankar v. K.Venkatesan
Case brief
What is this about?
The court allowed a fresh motion (CMP) seeking permission to amend a claim petition in an ongoing appeal, noting the second respondent had no objection.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to amend the claim petition in MCOP No.236 of 2017.
What the court decided
CMP No.15695 of 2021
CMP No.15695 of 2021
in
CMA SR No.77528 of 2021
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
This petition has been filed to permit the petitioner to amend the claim petition in MCOP No.236 of 2017.
- Heard Mr.U.Chithambaram, learned counsel for the petitioner.
3.Mr.S.R. Sumathy, learned counsel undertakes to file vakalat on
behalf of the second respondent and she has no objection for allowing this petition.
- Having regard to the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and this Court being satisfied with the same, this petition is allowed as prayed for.
- Registry is directed to number the main appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the same for admission on 02.11.2021, by printing the name of Ms.S.R.Sumathy as learned counsel for the 2nd respondent on the next hearing date.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to permit the petitioner to amend the claim petition in MCOP No.236 of 2017.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Petitioner
- respondent
Second Respondent
Coram
Abdul Quddose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court