The Secretary to Government v. v Jeyapal
Case brief
What is this about?
in W.A.No. SR.94220 of 2020 THE HON'BLE
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.1521 of 2021
in W.A.No. SR.94220 of 2020
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
The respondent is served and
represented by counsel. Learned counsel for respondent has no objection. In view of the sufficient cause shown, the delay in preferring the appeal is condoned and the appeal is taken on record. Let appropriate number be allotted to the matter. The appeal will appear a fortnight hence. (S.B., CJ.) (S.K.R., J.) 17.03.2021 tar
Coram
Chief Justice of Madras High Court
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court