The Single Judge admitted two appeals filed after a delay of 374 days. Upon reviewing the affidavit filed by the petitioner explaining the reasons for the delay, the court was satisfied and condoned the delay, allowing the petitions.
Delay of 374 days in representing the appeals was condoned; petitions allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.14628 & 14630 of 2021 in T.C.A.SR.Nos.120630 of 2019 & 2047 of 2021
T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J. ] (Through Video Conferencing)
Heard Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, learned Senior Standing Counsel and Mr.S.Rajesh, learned Standing Counsel for the petitioner.
2.Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, the delay of 374 days in representing these appeals is condoned and the petitions are allowed. (T.S.S., J.) (S.S.K., J.) 16.09.2021 jeni/mkn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 374 days in filing the appeals should be condoned?
T.S.SIVAGNANAM
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
