Allowed
The Income Tax Officer v. K.4442 Pethampalayam Primary Agricultural
Madras HCCMP/14334/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2021 in W.A.SR.Nos.71383 & 71382 of 2021…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.14334 & 14341 of 2021 in W.A.SR.Nos.71383 & 71382 of 2021
T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J. ] (Through Video Conferencing)
Heard Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.C.Prakasam, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2.Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petitions, the delay of 96 days in filing the appeals is condoned and the petitions are allowed.
(T.S.S., J.) (S.S.K., J.) 13.09.2021
Note :
1. Registry is directed to number the appeals, if they are otherwise in order.
2. The name of the learned counsel for the respondent to be printed in the cause list, when the appeals are listed for admission.
mkn
T.S. Sivagnanam
Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court