P.Ponnusami Gounder v. R.Chinnappa Nadar
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2008 and 5525 of 2016 in SA No.457 of…
What did the court decide?
CMP No.1433 of 2008 for impleadment of respondents 6 and 7 and CMP No.5525 of 2016 for impleadment of petitioners as respondents are allowed. Registry to amend and list main appeal.
What the court decided
CMP Nos.1433 of 2008 and 5525 of 2016 in SA No.457 of 2006
CMP Nos.1433 of 2008 and 5525 of 2016 in SA No.457 of 2006
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
CMP No.1433 of 2008 has been filed to implead the respondents 6
and 7 and CMP No.5525 of 2016 has been filed to implead the petitioners herein as respondents and rank them accordingly in the above Second Appeal.
- Heard Mr.T.M.Hariharan, learned counsel for the petitioner in
CMP No.1433 of 2008 as well as learned counsel for the respondents in CMP No.5525 of 2016 and Mr.N.Manokaran, learned counsel for the petitioner in CMP No.5525 of 2016.
- This Court is of the considered view that without prejudice to the
rights and contention of the respective parties in the main Second Appeal
as regards the impleadment of the Legal Representatives, these CMPs can
Coram
Abdul Quddoose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court