The single judge allowed two miscellaneous petitions filed by respondents to set aside orders dismissing civil revision petitions, recalling the earlier orders due to the counsel's absence caused by inadvertence and COVID-19 vaccination constraints.
Orders dated 31.03.2021 in CRP.PD.Nos.2705 of 2015 and 3923 of 2016 recalled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.Nos.13212 & 13213 of 2021 in CRP.PD.Nos.2705 of 2015 & 3923 of 2016
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
These miscellaneous petitions have been filed by the first respondent in CRP.No.3923 of 2016 and the sole respondent in CRP.No.2705 of 2015 to set aside the order dated 31.03.2021 passed in CRP.PD.Nos.2705 of 2015 and 3923 of 2016 for the reason that on the date of hearing of the above civil revision petitions i.e. 31.03.2021, inadvertently their counsel did not see the list. That apart, she has not taken vaccine for covid. Further, her husband also was suffered with Covid-19 and therefore, she could not appear before this Court and this Court allowed both the civil revision petitions. It is further stated that they have got good case to succeed in the civil revision petitions.
lok
02.11.2021 (½)
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
lok
CMP.Nos.13212 & 13213 of 2021 in CRP.PD.Nos.2705 of 2015 & 3923 of 2016
02.11.2021
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
