Natarajamoorthy v. Nagamani
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order condoning delay in the filing of an application on the grounds of serious health conditions affecting the petitioner and the wife.
What did the court decide?
Delay in filing the application condoned; registry directed to print counsel's name and number the appeal.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.12968 of 2021 in A.S.S.R.No.160334 of 2019 & A.S.No.662 of 2018
P.T.ASHA, J.
The learned counsel for the 1st respondent has no objection.
However, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the 4th and
5th respondent would submit that the reasons given in the affidavit
filed in support of the application is not convincing.
- Heard the learned counsel and a perusal of the affidavit filed in support of condone delay petition would reveal that the delay
has occurred on account of the serious health condition of the petitioner as well as the fact that his wife was also undergoing serious
gynaec problems.
- The reasons given appears adequate and sufficient, hence
the delay is condoned.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay in filing an application.
Whether the reasons for delay provided by the petitioner are adequate.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Petitioner
- respondent
1st Respondent
- respondent
4th and 5th Respondent
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court