Dhamodharasamy(Died) v. S.N.R.Sons Charitable Trust
Case brief
What is this about?
in SA.No.77 of 2013 RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J., It…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CMP.No.1231 of 2017 in SA.No.77 of 2013
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.,
It is reported that the first appellant dead and the petitioners are the legal representatives of the deceased first appellant. Petition filed in time.
2.Heard both sides. The factum of the death of the first appellant in S.A.No.77 of 2013 and the proposed parties are the legal representatives are not in dispute.
3.Considering the submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the applicants and on being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application, in the interest of justice, this petition is allowed.
4.Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title within a period of two weeks.
29.11.2021
nvi
2
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.,
nvi
CMP.No.1231 of 2017 in SA.No.77 of 2013
29.11.2021
Legal representatives of the deceased first appellant
Respondent
RMT TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court