Disposed

S.Deepika v. M/S.Arasan Vinayan Systems

Madras HC13 Aug 2021CMA(MD)/1440/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed the respondents for failing to deposit original educational certificates as previously directed. Liberty was granted to appellants to seek recovery of the documents or take suitable proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Liberty given to appellants to proceed against respondents for recovery of the educational certificates and to take any other suitable proceedings as per law.

S.Deepika Vs M/S.Arasan Vinayan Systems — Specific Performance | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CMA(MD). No.1440 of 2013

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

¶3

Wednesday, the Sixth day of October Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI

¶6

CMA(MD). No.1440 of 2013

¶7

1.S.Deepika

¶8

2.K.R.Sasidharan

¶9

... Appellants/Petitioners

¶10

1 M/s.Arasan Vinayan Systems

¶11

Through its Managing Director, Having Registered Office at Avt Mill Premises, Bye Pass Road, Chinnamani Nagar-II

¶12

Tuticorin

¶13

2 P.Samy Ayya

¶14

Sole Arbitrator Appointed by the All India Chamber of Commerce and Industries No.84/2,South Raja Street, Tuticorin ... Respondents/Respondents

¶15

Prayer :-

¶16

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under section 37,1 and 2 if Arbitration Act X of 1940 against the fair and decretal order dated 30.10.2012 passed in Arbitration O.P.No.304 of 2010 on the file of the file of the Principal District judge, Thoothukudi confirming the award dated 30.04.2010 passed by the second respndent in Arbitration No.5 of 2009.

¶17

ORDER:- This Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Thiru.M.Saravanan, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Thiru.T.Antony Arul Raj, for the first respondent, this Court made the following order:

¶18

This Court, by order dated 13.08.2021, has allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and directed the first respondent to produce all the Original Educational Certificates of the first appellant / S.Deepika and the matter was listed “for reporting compliance”

¶19

Today (ie.06.10.2021), when the matter was taken up for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ hearing, instead of producing the Educational Certificates of the first appellant, the first respondent filed a typed set along with a copy of the reply to the memo, dated 13.03.2010 filed on behalf of

¶20

CMA(MD). No.1440 of 2013

¶21

the appellant in Arbitration O.P.No.6 of 2009.

¶22

On the side of the first respondent, it is stated that no such Educational Certificates were deposited. In the memo, it is stated as follows:-

¶23

“1.The documents referred in SI.No.1 to 4 have no relevance to the dispute caused by failure of the 1^st respondent in observing clause (1) of the Intellectual Property agreement, dated 14.08.2008.

¶24

2. The 1^st Respondent had not deposited any of her original certificates with the Petitioner.

¶25

The memo has been filed by the I & II Respondents as dilatory tactics.

¶26

The Hon'ble Arbitrator be pleased to award as prayed for in the Petition.”

¶27

On the side of the first respondent, it is stated that no Educational Certificates were deposited by the appellants and no such Educational Certificates are available with the first respondent.

¶28

The respondents have not complied the directions of this Court. Hence, liberty is given to the appellants to proceed against the respondents for recovery of the Educational Certificates and to take any other suitable proceedings as per law.

¶29

¶30

The Prin cipal District Judge, Thoothukudi

¶31

+1cc to R.Subramanian, Advocate Sr.No. 31412 dated 06.10.2021

¶32

ORDER DATED : 06/10/2021 ========================== ORDER

¶33

========================== CMA(MD). No.1440 of 2013

¶34

Giving direction and etc. as stated within. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ KM(CO) SB/NS (19.11.2021) 2P 3C

S.Deepika v. M/S.Arasan Vinayan Systems

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Deepika v. M/S.Arasan Vinayan Systems

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The National Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs Minor Vignesh

The Branch Manager Vs Santhana Krishnan

Alagarsamy, Vs Suba Karmegam

K.Periyasamy (Died) Vs Saraswathi

C.Selvi Vs M/S.Arasan Vinayan Systems

Adlin Jeba Kani Vs Chelladurai