Dismissed
Muruganantham v. Priya
Madras HCCMA/854/2010
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This single judge order dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act for non-prosecution as no representation appeared from the appellants.
What did the court decide?
The civil miscellaneous appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶2
DATED : 01.10.2021
¶3
CORAM
¶4
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
¶5
C.M.A.No.854 of 2010
¶6
1.Muruganantham
2.Arumugam ... Appellants/Respondents 1 & 2
¶7
Vs
¶8
1.Priya
2.Minor Narendragiri
(Represented by his mother/1st respondent)
3.Rajeswari
4.Ramasamy
5.Vellingiri
6.United India Insurance Company Limited,
No.11/2, K.T.Complex,
New Scheme Road,
Pollachi – 642 002 ... Respondents/Petitioners
¶9
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of
the Motor Vehicles Act, against the Judgment and Decree passed
in MCOP.No.1650 of 2006 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims
Tribunal, Additional District and Sessions Court, and Presiding
Officer Special Court for E.C.Act cases Coimbatore dated
11.06.2008.
¶10
For Appellant : No appearance
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Muruganantham
- appellant
Arumugam
- respondent
Priya
- respondent
Narendragiri
- respondent
Rajeswari
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court