Ragupahy v. P.Saravanan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an appeal filed against an order of the Motor Vehicle Accidents Claims Tribunal awarding compensation for disability resulting from a motor vehicle accident, finding the quantum reasonable.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
C.M.A.No.689 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
Ragupathy ..Appellant/6th Respondent
Versus
- P.Saravanan
- Palani
- United India Insurance Company, Branch Office at 19/2, Sooramangalam Main Road, Salem – 5.
- R.Murugavel
- Cholamandalam M.S.General Insurance Company Limited, Motor Insurance Cover Note No.770035, Erode – 638 009.
- Amirthalingam ..Respondents/Petitioner and RR 1 to 5
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the compensation of Rs.4,66,054/- awarded by the Tribunal is excessive and based on sufficient materials.
Whether the Main Court's judgment should be set aside based on the quantum of compensation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ragupathy
- respondent
P.Saravanan
- respondent
Palani
- respondent
United India Insurance Company
- respondent
R.Murugavel
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court