The High Court of Madras disposed of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal as infructuous following the counsel's endorsement, resulting in the closure of the connected miscellaneous petition without costs.
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal disposed of as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.03.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.A.No.3517 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011
1.K.V.Kandasamy Chettiar
2.K.Amsaveni
..Appellants/Respondents
Vs. ..Respondent/Claimant
S.Eawarasamy ..Respondent/Claimant Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 47 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, against the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Judge of Coimbatore dated 14.07.2011, G.W.O.P.No.87 of 2010.
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellants, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in C.M.A.No.3517 of 2011 stands disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS IV ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar kak
To
The Principal District Judge, Coimbatore.
Copy to The Section Officer VR Section High Court, Madras +1 cc to Mr.V.Nicholas Advocate sr13545 +1 cc to M/s.R.Hemalatha Advocate sr13915 C.M.A.No.3517 of 2011 ln(co) aa19/03/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.V.Kandasamy Chettiar and Another
S.Eawarasamy
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
